4.5 Article

Identification and characterization of three PeSHRs and one PeSCR involved in adventitious root development of Populus

期刊

PLANT CELL TISSUE AND ORGAN CULTURE
卷 117, 期 2, 页码 253-264

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s11240-014-0437-0

关键词

SHR/SCR pathway; Bimolecular fluorescence complementation (BiFC); Adventitious root development; Populus

资金

  1. Natural Science Foundation of the Jiangsu Higher Education Institutions of China [13KJA220002]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [31100484]
  3. Innovative Research Project for Postgraduates in Colleges of Jiangsu Province [CXZZ13_0549]
  4. Priority Academic Program Development of Jiangsu Higher Education Institutions (PAPD)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The plant-specific GRAS family transcription factors, SHORT-ROOT (SHR) and SCARECROW (SCR), are key regulators of both the specification of the root stem cell niche and the differentiation potential of a subset of stem cells in the Arabidopsis root. Our previous microarray study indicated that SHR and SCR genes were involved in adventitious root development from hardwood cuttings in Populus. Here, we isolated and characterized three genes encoding SHR proteins and one gene encoding SCR proteins: PeSHR1, PeSHR2, PeSHR3 and PeSCR. Sequence and structure analysis showed that these proteins contained five well-conserved domains: leucine heptad repeat I (LHR I), the VHIID motif, leucine heptad repeat II (LHR II), the PFYRE motif, and the SAM motif. Temporal and spatial expression patterns of these genes were profiled during adventitious root development. Subcellular localization demonstrated that PeSHR1, PeSHR2 and PeSCR were localized to the nucleus, while PeSHR3 was localized to the cytoplasm. Finally, we adapted bimolecular fluorescence complementation to demonstrate that there was interaction between PeSHR1 and PeSCR. Collectively, these results contribute to improving our understanding of conserved and divergent aspects of SHR and SCR in various species.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据