4.5 Article

Role of nitric oxide in UV-B-induced activation of PAL and stimulation of flavonoid biosynthesis in Ginkgo biloba callus

期刊

PLANT CELL TISSUE AND ORGAN CULTURE
卷 97, 期 2, 页码 175-185

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s11240-009-9513-2

关键词

Ginkgo biloba; Nitric oxide; Flavonoid biosynthesis; UV-B irradiation

资金

  1. Taishan Medical University [2005-04]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The role of nitric oxide (NO) in UV-B-induced secondary metabolite accumulation in Ginkgo biloba callus was investigated. Overall, UV-B irradiation induced multiple biological responses in callus of G. biloba, including increased both NO production and nitric oxide synthase (NOS) activity, and subsequent activation of phenylalanine ammonium lyase (PAL) and synthesis of flavonoids. Application of NO via the donor sodium nitroprusside (SNP) enhanced UV-B-induced PAL activity and increased accumulation of flavonoids in G. biloba callus. Both, the NOS inhibitor l-NAME (N (G)-nitro-l-arginine methyl ester) and the NO scavenger c-PTIO (2-phenyl-4,4,5,5-tetramethyl-imidazoline-1-oxyl-3-oxide) reduced the production of NO. Moreover, UV-B-induced increase of PAL activity and flavonoid accumulation were suppressed by l-NAME and c-PTIO. These findings suggested a causal relationship between NO release and both PAL activity and flavonoid accumulation under UV-B irradiation. In addition, it also indicated that NO, produced via NOS-like activity in ginkgo callus subjected to UV-B irradiation, might act as an essential signaling molecule for triggering the activation of PAL and synthesis of flavonoids. Additionally, a guanylyl cyclase inhibitor 6-anilino-5,8-quinolinequinone (LY-83583) prevented both UV-B- and SNP-induced enhancement of PAL activation and flavonoid biosynthesis thus suggesting that the NO function was mediated by cyclic guanosine 5'-monophosphate. However, these effects of c-PTIO, l-NAME, and LY-83583 were partial, thus suggesting that there were NO-independent pathways in UV-B signaling networks.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据