4.5 Article

Agrobacterium-mediated transformation of mature Prunus serotina (black cherry) and regeneration of transgenic shoots

期刊

PLANT CELL TISSUE AND ORGAN CULTURE
卷 101, 期 1, 页码 49-57

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s11240-009-9662-3

关键词

Agamous; Genetic engineering; Leaf explants; RNAi

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A protocol for Agrobacterium-mediated transformation was developed for in vitro leaf explants of an elite, mature Prunus serotina tree. Agrobacterium tumefaciens strain EHA105 harboring an RNAi plasmid with the black cherry AGAMOUS (AG) gene was used. Bacteria were induced for 12 h with 200 mu M acetosyringone for vir gene induction before leaf explant inoculation. Explants were co-cultured for 3 days, and then cultured on woody plant medium supplemented with 9.08 mu M thidiazuron, 1.07 mu M napthaleneacetic acid, 60 mu M silver thiosulphate, 3% sucrose, plus 200 mg l(-1) timentin in darkness for 3 weeks. Regenerating shoots were selected 27 days after initial co-culture, on Murashige and Skoog medium with 3% sucrose, 8.88 mu M 6-benzylaminopurine, 0.49 mu M indole-3-butyric acid, 0.29 mu M gibberellic acid, 200 mg l(-1) timentin, and 30 mg l(-1) kanamycin for five subcultures. After 5-6 months of selection, transformation efficiencies were determined, based on polymerase chain reaction (PCR) analysis of individual putative transformed shoots relative to the initial number of leaf explants tested. The transformation efficiency was 1.2%. Southern blot analysis of three out of four PCR-positive shoots confirmed the presence of the neomycin phosphotransferase and AG genes. Transgenic shoots were rooted (37.5%), but some shoot tips and leaves deteriorated or died, making acclimatization of rooted transgenic plants difficult. This transformation, regeneration, and rooting protocol for developing transgenic black cherry will continue to be evaluated in future experiments, in order to optimize the system for several mature black cherry genotypes.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据