4.5 Article

Effects of temperature, photoperiod and culture vessel size on adventitious shoot production of in vitro propagated Huernia hystrix

期刊

PLANT CELL TISSUE AND ORGAN CULTURE
卷 99, 期 2, 页码 233-238

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s11240-009-9592-0

关键词

CAM; Culture container; Environmental factors; Micropropagation; Succulent; Tissue culture

资金

  1. National Research Foundation
  2. South Africa and University of KwaZulu-Natal

向作者/读者索取更多资源

High production costs due to low growth rate in vitro and high labour costs are among factors limiting commercial application of micropropagation techniques. The low growth rate could be due to unfavourable or sub-optimal environmental and chemical conditions of the cultures. The effects of temperature, photoperiod and culture vessel size were investigated on adventitious shoot production of Huernia hystrix. There were significant increases in shoot proliferation with increased temperature in cultures maintained under a 16 h photoperiod. Slow growth observed at low temperatures (15 and 20A degrees C) offers a potential strategy for cost-effective in vitro storage of H. hystrix germplasm. The maximum adventitious shoots produced per explant and percentage of explants producing shoots (4.2 +/- A 0.74 and 94% respectively) were observed in cultures maintained at 35A degrees C, the optimum temperature for photosynthesis in plants possessing crassulacean acid metabolism (CAM). The nocturnal accumulation of organic acids in cultures incubated under a 16 h photoperiod further suggest the presence of CAM in this species. On the other hand, cultures kept under continuous light appear to shift to a C-3 photosynthetic pathway. There was a significant decrease in fresh weight of adventitious shoots regenerated per explant as temperature increased. The use of larger culture vessels further increased the shoot proliferation to 5.6 shoots per explant with a potential production of 3,429 shoots per m(2) in the growth room compared to 2,750 shoots per m(2) using culture tubes.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据