4.7 Review

An annotated database of Arabidopsis mutants of acyl lipid metabolism

期刊

PLANT CELL REPORTS
卷 34, 期 4, 页码 519-532

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s00299-014-1710-8

关键词

Lipases; Regulatory mutants; ARALIP

资金

  1. Department of Energy-Great Lakes Bioenergy Research Center [DE-FC02-07ER64494]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

We have constructed and annotated a web-based database of over 280 Arabidopsis genes that have characterized mutants associated with Arabidopsis acyl lipid metabolism. Mutants have played a fundamental role in gene discovery and in understanding the function of genes involved in plant acyl lipid metabolism. The first mutant in Arabidopsis lipid metabolism (fad4) was described in 1985. Since that time, characterization of mutants in more than 280 genes associated with acyl lipid metabolism has been reported. This review provides a brief background and history on identification of mutants in acyl lipid metabolism, an analysis of the distribution of mutants in different areas of acyl lipid metabolism and presents an annotated database (ARALIPmutantDB) of these mutants. The database provides information on the phenotypes of mutants, pathways and enzymes/proteins associated with the mutants, and allows rapid access via hyperlinks to summaries of information about each mutant and to literature that provides information on the lipid composition of the mutants. In addition, the database of mutants is integrated within the ARALIP plant acyl lipid metabolism website (http://aralip.plantbiology.msu.eduhttp://aralip.plantbiology.msu.edu TargetType=URL/) so that information on mutants is displayed on and can be accessed from metabolic pathway maps. Mutants for at least 30 % of the genes in the database have multiple names, which have been compiled here to reduce ambiguities in searches for information. The database should also provide a tool for exploring the relationships between mutants in acyl lipid-related genes and their lipid phenotypes and point to opportunities for further research.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据