4.7 Review

The rice MAPKK-MAPK interactome: the biological significance of MAPK components in hormone signal transduction

期刊

PLANT CELL REPORTS
卷 32, 期 6, 页码 923-931

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s00299-013-1437-y

关键词

MAPK; MAPKK; MAPK cascade; SA; JA; Ethylene; ABA

资金

  1. Next-Generation BioGreen 21 Program (Plant Molecular Breeding Center), Rural Development Administration, Republic of Korea [PJ008061]
  2. Rural Development Administration (RDA), Republic of Korea [PJ008061012013] Funding Source: Korea Institute of Science & Technology Information (KISTI), National Science & Technology Information Service (NTIS)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) signaling cascades are evolutionarily conserved fundamental signal transduction pathways. A MAPK cascade consists of many distinct MAPKKK-MAPKK-MAPK modules linked to various upstream receptors and downstream targets through sequential phosphorylation and activation of the cascade components. These cascades collaborate in transmitting a variety of extracellular signals and in controlling cellular responses and processes such as growth, differentiation, cell death, hormonal signaling, and stress responses. Although MAPK proteins play central roles in signal transduction pathways, our knowledge of MAPK signaling in hormonal responses in rice has been limited to a small subset of specific upstream and downstream interacting targets. However, recent studies revealing direct MAPK and MAPKK interactions have provided the basis for elucidating interaction specificities, functional divergence, and functional modulation during hormonal responses. In this review, we highlight current insights into MAPKK-MAPK interaction patterns in rice, with emphasis on the biological significance of these interacting pairs in SA (salicylic acid), JA (jasmonic acid), ET (ethylene), and ABA (abscisic acid) responses, and discuss the challenges in understanding functional signal transduction networks mediated by these hormones.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据