4.7 Article

Expression profiles of precursor and mature microRNAs under dehydration and high salinity shock in Populus euphratica

期刊

PLANT CELL REPORTS
卷 30, 期 10, 页码 1893-1907

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s00299-011-1096-9

关键词

Precursor and mature miRNAs; Expression; Dehydration shock; High salinity shock; Populus euphratica

资金

  1. State Forestry Administration of China [2007-4-01]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [30730077, 30972339, 31070597]
  3. University of China [NCET-07-0083]
  4. National Key Technologies R&D Program of China [2011BAD38B01]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

MicroRNAs (miRNAs) are small non-coding RNAs that play vital roles in plant abiotic stress responses via cleavage or translational inhibition of their target mRNAs. Populus euphratica is a typical stress-resistant sessile organism that grows in desert areas. Here, we identified sequences of 12 miRNA precursors from 11 families and 13 mature miRNAs from 12 families by PCR amplification in P. euphratica. To detect expression differences in mature miRNAs and their precursors under dehydration and high salinity shock in P. euphratica, we examined 14 miRNA precursors from 13 miRNA families and 17 mature miRNAs from 17 miRNA families using the SYBR Green RT-PCR assay. This is the first report of expression profiles for both precursor and mature miRNAs in P. euphratica. By profiling both the mature miRNAs and the precursors under abiotic stress shock, it was possible to identify miRNA whose processing is regulated during stress shock environments. A majority of the genes predicted to be targets for plant miRNAs are involved in development, stress resistance and metabolic processes. We have cloned and experimentally identified in vivo five of the predicted target genes and quantified the five target mRNAs from the same RNA sample simultaneously. Based on this study, we propose some regulatory pathways that illustrate the important role that miRNAs play in response to abiotic stress shock in P. euphratica.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据