4.7 Article

Implications of the mesophyll conductance to CO2 for photosynthesis and water-use efficiency during long-term water stress and recovery in two contrasting Eucalyptus species

期刊

PLANT CELL AND ENVIRONMENT
卷 37, 期 11, 页码 2470-2490

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/pce.12325

关键词

Eucalyptus dumosa; Eucalyptus pauciflora; drought; iWUE; online carbon isotope discrimination; oxidative stress; refixation CO2; respiration; re-watering

资金

  1. Regional Government of Madrid
  2. project 'ECOFISEPI' [AGL2011-25365]
  3. Fundacion Gonzalez Esparcia
  4. Consejo Social de la Universidad Politecnica de Madrid
  5. REGENFOR-CM [S2009AMB-1668]
  6. Australian Research Council

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Water stress (WS) slows growth and photosynthesis (A(n)), but most knowledge comes from short-time studies that do not account for longer term acclimation processes that are especially relevant in tree species. Using two Eucalyptus species that contrast in drought tolerance, we induced moderate and severe water deficits by withholding water until stomatal conductance (g(sw)) decreased to two pre-defined values for 24 d, WS was maintained at the target g(sw) for 29 d and then plants were re-watered. Additionally, we developed new equations to simulate the effect on mesophyll conductance (g(m)) of accounting for the resistance to refixation of CO2. The diffusive limitations to CO2, dominated by the stomata, were the most important constraints to A(n). Full recovery of A(n) was reached after re-watering, characterized by quick recovery of g(m) and even higher biochemical capacity, in contrast to the slower recovery of g(sw). The acclimation to long-term WS led to decreased mesophyll and biochemical limitations, in contrast to studies in which stress was imposed more rapidly. Finally, we provide evidence that higher g(m) under WS contributes to higher intrinsic water-use efficiency (iWUE) and reduces the leaf oxidative stress, highlighting the importance of g(m) as a target for breeding/genetic engineering.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据