4.7 Article

Glycinebetaine enhances the tolerance of tomato plants to high temperature during germination of seeds and growth of seedlings

期刊

PLANT CELL AND ENVIRONMENT
卷 34, 期 11, 页码 1931-1943

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-3040.2011.02389.x

关键词

heat-shock protein; seed germination

资金

  1. State Key Basic Research and Development Plan of China [2009CB118500]
  2. Program for Changjiang Scholars and the Innovative Research Team in University [IRT0635]
  3. National Natural Sciences Foundation of China [30970229]
  4. Research Fund for the Doctoral Program of Higher Education of China [3702110007]
  5. Oregon Agricultural Experiment Station

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum cv. 'Moneymaker') was transformed with a codA gene, from Arthrobacter globiformis, for choline oxidase that had been modified to allow targeting to both chloroplasts and the cytosol. Glycinebetaine (GB) accumulated in seeds of transformed plants up to 1 mmol g(-1) dry weight (DW), while no detectable GB was found in wild-type (WT) seeds. The codA-transgenic seeds germinated faster and at higher frequency than WT seeds with high temperature treatment. After heat stress, levels of expression of a mitochondrial small heat-shock protein (MT-sHSP), heat-shock protein 70 (HSP70) and heat-shock cognate 70 (HSC70) were higher in transgenic seeds than in WT seeds during heat stress, and the accumulation of HSP70 was more prominent in codA-transgenic seeds than in WT seeds. Addition of GB to the germination medium or imbibition of seeds in a solution of GB enhanced the tolerance of WT seeds to high temperatures. WT seeds treated with exogenous GB also expressed heat-shock genes at elevated levels and accumulated more HSP70 than controls. Our results suggest that GB, either applied exogenously or accumulated in vivo in codA-transgenic seeds, enhanced the expression of heat-shock genes in and improved the tolerance to high temperature of tomato seeds during germination.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据