4.7 Article

An ATP signalling pathway in plant cells: extracellular ATP triggers programmed cell death in Populus euphratica

期刊

PLANT CELL AND ENVIRONMENT
卷 35, 期 5, 页码 893-916

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-3040.2011.02461.x

关键词

Ca2+; eATP signalling; H2O2; mitochondria; NO; PCD; poplar

资金

  1. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities [JC2011-2, BLYJ200903]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [30872005, 31170570]
  3. Foundation for the Supervisors of Excellent Doctoral Dissertations of Beijing [YB20081002201]
  4. Beijing Natural Science Foundation [6112017]
  5. Ministry of Education [209084]
  6. HI-TECH Research and Development Program of China (863 Program) [2006AA10Z131]
  7. Natural Science Foundation of Hubei Province [2007ABB003]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

We elucidated the extracellular ATP (eATP) signalling cascade active in programmed cell death (PCD) using cell cultures of Populus euphratica. Millimolar amounts of eATP induced a dose- and time-dependent reduction in viability, and the agonist-treated cells displayed hallmark features of PCD. eATP caused an elevation of cytosolic Ca2+ levels, resulting in Ca2+ uptake by the mitochondria and subsequent H2O2 accumulation. P. euphratica exhibited an increased mitochondrial transmembrane potential, and cytochrome c was released without opening of the permeability transition pore over the period of ATP stimulation. Moreover, the eATP-induced increase of intracellular ATP, essential for the activation of caspase-like proteases and subsequent PCD, was found to be related to increased mitochondrial transmembrane potential. NO is implicated as a downstream component of the cytosolic Ca2+ concentration but plays a negligible role in eATP-stimulated cell death. We speculate that ATP binds purinoceptors in the plasma membrane, leading to the induction of downstream intermediate signals, as the proposed sequence of events in PCD signalling was terminated by the animal P2 receptor antagonist suramin.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据