4.7 Article

Patterns of PIP gene expression in Populus trichocarpa during recovery from xylem embolism suggest a major role for the PIP1 aquaporin subfamily as moderators of refilling process

期刊

PLANT CELL AND ENVIRONMENT
卷 33, 期 8, 页码 1285-1297

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-3040.2010.02147.x

关键词

aquaporin; drought stress

资金

  1. Arnold Arboretum of Harvard University
  2. National Science Foundation [IOS-0919729]
  3. Air Force Office of Scientific Research [FA9550-09-1-0188]
  4. Division Of Integrative Organismal Systems
  5. Direct For Biological Sciences [1265946] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Embolism and the refilling of xylem vessels are intrinsic to the ability of plants to handle the transport of water under tension. Although the formation of an embolized vessel is an abiotic process, refilling against the pressure gradient requires biological activity to provide both the energy and the water needed to restore xylem transport capacity. Here, we present an analysis of the dynamics of embolism and refilling in Populus trichocarpa and follow temporal dynamics of co-occurring changes in expression level of aquaporins. Under mesic conditions, we found that the percent loss of conductance (PLC) varied diurnally by as much as 20%, suggesting a continuous embolism/refilling cycle. An increase in water stress tilted the balance between the two processes and increased the PLC to as much as 80%. Subsequent re-watering resulted in the reversal of water stress and recovery of PLC to pre-stress levels. Stem parenchyma cells responded to drought stress with considerable up-regulation of the PIP1 subfamily of water channels but not the PIP2 subfamily. Even more significant was the finding that PoptrPIP1.1 and PoptrPIP1.3 genes were up-regulated in response to embolism, but not to water stress, and were down-regulated after embolism removal, suggesting a local ability of plants to sense an embolism presence.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据