4.7 Article

Minimum hydraulic safety leads to maximum water-use efficiency in a forage grass

期刊

PLANT CELL AND ENVIRONMENT
卷 34, 期 2, 页码 302-313

出版社

WILEY-BLACKWELL
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-3040.2010.02244.x

关键词

grass; hydraulic conductivity; production; safety margin; stomatal regulation; water stress; water-use efficiency; xylem vulnerability

资金

  1. Australian Research Fellowship
  2. Australian Research Council
  3. Dairy Australia Research and Development Scholarship
  4. Australian Postgraduate Award
  5. Tasmanian ICT Centre, CSIRO

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Understanding how water-use regulation relates to biomass accumulation is imperative for improving crop production in water-limited environments. Here, we examine how the vulnerability of xylem to water stress-induced cavitation and the coordination between water transport capacity and assimilation (A) influences diurnal water-use efficiency (WUE) and dry-matter production in Lolium perenne L. - a commercial forage grass. Plants were exposed to a range of water stresses, causing up to 90% leaf death, by withholding water and then rewatering to observe the recovery process. Leaf hydraulic conductance (K-leaf) declined to 50% of maximum at a leaf water potential (Sigma(leaf)) of -1 MPa, whereas complete stomatal closure occurred well after this point, at -2.35 MPa, providing no protection against hydraulic dysfunction. Instantaneous A remained maximal until > 70% of hydraulic conductivity had been lost. Post-stress rewatering showed that 95% loss of K-leaf could be incurred before the recovery of gas exchange exceeded 1 d, with a rapid transition to leaf death after this point. Plants exposed to sustained soil water deficits through restricted nightly watering regimes did not suffer cumulative losses in K-leaf; instead, Sigma(leaf) and gas exchange recovered diurnally. The effect was improved WUE during the day and optimal Sigma(leaf) during the night for the maintenance of growth.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据