4.7 Article

Temporal heterogeneity of cold acclimation phenotypes in Arabidopsis leaves

期刊

PLANT CELL AND ENVIRONMENT
卷 33, 期 2, 页码 244-258

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-3040.2009.02074.x

关键词

Arabidopsis; anatomy; carbohydrates; phenotypic plasticity; photosynthesis; respiration; stomata; temperature

资金

  1. UK Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council (BBSRC)
  2. Natural Environment Research Council (NERC) [NER/A/S/2001/01186]
  3. NERC [NE/D01168X/1] Funding Source: UKRI
  4. Natural Environment Research Council [NE/D01168X/1] Funding Source: researchfish

向作者/读者索取更多资源

To predict the effects of temperature changes on plant growth and performance, it is crucial to understand the impact of thermal history on leaf morphology, anatomy and physiology. Here, we document a comprehensive range of leaf phenotypes in 25/20 degrees C-grown Arabidopsis thaliana plants that were shifted to 5 degrees C for up to 2 months. When warm-grown, pre-existing (PE) leaves were exposed to cold, leaf thickness increased due to an increase in mesophyll cell size. Leaves that were entirely cold-developed (CD) were twice as thick (eight cell layers) as their warm-developed (WD) counterparts (six layers), and also had higher epidermal and stomatal cell densities. After 4 d of cold, PE leaves accumulated high levels of total non-structural carbohydrates (TNC). However, glucose and starch levels declined thereafter, and after 45 d in the cold, PE leaves exhibited similar TNC to CD leaves. A similar phenomenon was observed in delta 13C and a range of photosynthetic parameters. In cold-treated PE leaves, an increase in respiration (R-dark) with cold exposure time was evident when measured at 25 degrees C but not 5 degrees C. Cold acclimation was associated with a large increase in the ratio of leaf R-dark to photosynthesis. The data highlight the importance of understanding developmental thermal history in determining individual phenotypic traits.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据