4.7 Article

Species-specific activation time-lags can explain habitat restrictions in hydrophilic lichens

期刊

PLANT CELL AND ENVIRONMENT
卷 33, 期 5, 页码 851-862

出版社

WILEY-BLACKWELL PUBLISHING, INC
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-3040.2009.02111.x

关键词

Bryoria bicolor; Lobaria amplissima; Platismatia glauca; Platismatia norvegica; Usnea longissima; hydrophilic epiphytic lichens; photosynthesis; photosystem II activation; suboceanic distributional patterns; water relations

资金

  1. Centre for Environmental Research (CMF, Umea)
  2. Swedish forest company Sveaskog

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Photosystem II (PSII) activation after hydration with water or humid air was measured in four hydrophilic and a generalist lichen to test the hypothesis that slow activation might explain habitat restriction in the former group. For the hydrophilic species, activation was after 4 h nearly completed in Lobaria amplissima and Platismatia norvegica, while only c. 50% for Bryoria bicolor and Usnea longissima. The generalist Platismatia glauca was activated instantaneously. The effect of this on lichen field performance was investigated using a dynamic model separating the two water sources rain and humid air. Model simulations were made using the species-specific characteristics and climate data from 12 stream microhabitats. For U. longissima, slow PSII activation could reduce realized photosynthesis by a factor of five. Bryoria bicolor was almost as severely affected, while P. norvegica displayed moderate reductions. Lobaria amplissima displayed longer realized activity periods even in unfavourable microclimates, possibly because of a higher water loss resistance. Both close proximity to streams and presence of turbulent water had a positive impact on realized activity among the slowly activated species, coinciding with observed distribution patterns of hydrophilic species. The results presented here may thus partly explain observed habitat restrictions of rare hydrophilic lichens.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据