4.7 Article

Nitrogen fertilization enhances water-use efficiency in a saline environment

期刊

PLANT CELL AND ENVIRONMENT
卷 33, 期 3, 页码 344-357

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-3040.2009.02072.x

关键词

Avicennia marina; mangroves; nutrient limitation; phosphorus; photosynthesis; salinity; stomatal conductance

资金

  1. Australian Postgraduate Award
  2. Kioloa Joy London Foundation
  3. American Association for the Advancement of Science
  4. National Science Foundation [DEB-9981535]
  5. Johnston Fund of the Smithsonian Institution

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Effects of salinity and nutrients on carbon gain in relation to water use were studied in the grey mangrove, Avicennia marina, growing along a natural salinity gradient in south-eastern Australia. Tall trees characterized areas of seawater salinities (fringe zone) and stunted trees dominated landward hypersaline areas (scrub zone). Trees were fertilized with nitrogen (+N) or phosphorus (+P) or unfertilized. There was no significant effect of +P on shoot growth, whereas +N enhanced canopy development, particularly in scrub trees. Scrub trees maintained greater CO2 assimilation per unit water transpired (water-use efficiency, WUE) and had lower nitrogen-use efficiency (NUE; CO2 assimilation rate per unit leaf nitrogen) than fringe trees. The CO2 assimilation rates of +N trees were similar to those in other treatments, but were achieved at lower transpiration rates, stomatal conductance and intercellular CO2 concentrations. Maintaining comparable assimilation rates at lower stomatal conductance requires greater ribulose 1 center dot 5-bisphosphate carboxylase/oxygenase activity, consistent with greater N content per unit leaf area in +N trees. Hence, +N enhanced WUE at the expense of NUE. Instantaneous WUE estimates were supported by less negative foliar delta 13C values for +N trees and scrub control trees. Thus, nutrient enrichment may alter the structure and function of mangrove forests along salinity gradients.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据