4.7 Article

Plant mitochondria electron partitioning is independent of short-term temperature changes

期刊

PLANT CELL AND ENVIRONMENT
卷 32, 期 5, 页码 585-591

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-3040.2009.01953.x

关键词

carbon use efficiency; dark respiration; mitochondrial alternative oxidase; oxygen isotope discrimination

资金

  1. Human Frontiers in Science Program [ST00277/2004]
  2. UWA
  3. Australian Research Council [DP0344927]
  4. Universitat de les Illes Balears [BFU2005-03102/BFI, BFU2008-0172/BFI]
  5. Spanish Ministry of Science and Education
  6. Australian Research Council [DP0344927] Funding Source: Australian Research Council

向作者/读者索取更多资源

We tested the hypotheses that relative activity of the less efficient alternative oxidase (AOX) path changes with diurnal temperature changes, and thus changes carbon use efficiency with temperature. The activities of the alternative and cytochrome oxidase (COX) paths in plant tissues of three species were determined by measuring O-18/O-16 discrimination and total respiration from 17 to 36 degrees C. A new, more accurate method for calculating oxygen uptake rate from the mass spectrometry data was developed. Total carbon use efficiency was calculated from the ratio of respiratory heat and CO2 rates measured from 10 to 35 degrees C. Oxygen isotope discrimination (22.9 +/- 0.4 parts per thousand) and AOX participation were invariant with temperature in leaf tissue of Cucurbita pepo, Nicotiana sativa and Vicia faba, thus falsifying the first part of the hypothesis. Stress responses of respiration at the temperature extremes limited the range for which carbon use efficiency could be accurately measured to 15-30 degrees C in N. sativa, to 10-25 degrees C in C. pepo and to 20-30 degrees C in V. faba. Carbon-use efficiency was invariant at these temperatures in these species, demonstrating that changes in other pathways that would vary carbon-use efficiency were also invariant with temperature.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据