4.7 Article

Variations in the dorso-ventral organization of leaf structure and Kranz anatomy coordinate the control of photosynthesis and associated signalling at the whole leaf level in monocotyledonous species

期刊

PLANT CELL AND ENVIRONMENT
卷 32, 期 12, 页码 1833-1844

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-3040.2009.02043.x

关键词

Paspalum; abaxial; adaxial leaf specification; C-3 photosynthesis; C-4 photosynthesis; Durum wheat; Kranz anatomy; maize; stomata

资金

  1. Fundacao para a Ciencia e a Tecnologia [SFRH/13728/2003]
  2. Fundacao Calouste Gulbenkian
  3. Society for Experimental Biology
  4. UK Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council.

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Photosynthesis and associated signalling are influenced by the dorso-ventral properties of leaves. The degree of adaxial/abaxial symmetry in stomatal numbers, photosynthetic regulation with respect to light orientation and the total section areas of the bundle sheath (BS) cells and the surrounding mesophyll (M) cells on the adaxial and abaxial sides of the vascular bundles were compared in two C-4 [Zea mays (maize) and Paspalum dilatatum] and one C-3 [Triticum turgidum (Durum wheat)] monocotyledonous species. The C-3 leaves had a higher degree of dorso-ventral symmetry than the C-4 leaves. Photosynthetic regulation was the same on each side of the wheat leaves, as were stomatal numbers and the section area of the BS relative to that of the M cells (BS/M section area ratio). In contrast, photosynthetic regulation in maize and P. dilatatum leaves showed a marked surface-specific response to light orientation. Compared to the adaxial sides of the C-4 monocotyledonous leaves, the abaxial surfaces had more stomata and the BS/M section area ratio was significantly higher. Differences in dorso-ventral structure, particularly in Kranz anatomy, serve not only to maximize photosynthetic capacity with respect light orientation in C-4 monocotyledonous leaves but also allow adaxial and abaxial-specific signalling from the respective M cells.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据