4.7 Article

Role of corticular photosynthesis following defoliation in Eucalyptus globulus

期刊

PLANT CELL AND ENVIRONMENT
卷 32, 期 8, 页码 1004-1014

出版社

WILEY-BLACKWELL PUBLISHING, INC
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-3040.2009.01984.x

关键词

carbon budget; carbohydrates; carotenoids; chlorophyll; CO(2) fixation; defoliation; light-saturated photosynthesis; stem CO(2) flux

资金

  1. Australian Department of Climate Change
  2. CRC for Forestry
  3. ARC [LP0454287]
  4. Australian Research Council [LP0454287] Funding Source: Australian Research Council

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Defoliation can reduce net fixation of atmospheric CO(2) by the canopy, but increase the intensity and duration of photosynthetically active radiation on stems. Stem CO(2) flux and leaf gas exchange in young Eucalyptus globulus seedlings were measured to assess the impact of defoliation on these processes and to determine the potential contribution of re-fixation by photosynthetic inner bark in offsetting the effects of defoliation in a woody species. Pot and field trials examined how artificial defoliation of the canopy affected the photosynthetic characteristics of main stems of young Eucalyptus globulus seedlings. Defoliated potted seedlings were characterized by transient increases in foliar photosynthetic rates and concomitant decreases in stem CO(2) fluxes (both in the dark and light). Defoliated field-grown seedlings showed similar stem CO(2) flux responses, but of reduced magnitude. Despite demonstrating increased re-fixation capability, defoliated potted-seedlings had slowed stem growth. The green stem of seedlings exhibited largely shade-adapted characteristics. Defoliation reduced stem chlorophyll a/b ratio and increased carotenoid concentration. An increased capacity to re-fix internally respired CO(2) (up to 96%) suggested that stem re-fixation represents a previously unexplored mechanism to minimize the impact of foliar loss by maximizing the contribution of all photosynthetic tissues, particularly for young seedlings.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据