4.7 Article

Responses of Brassica oleracea cultivars to infestation by the aphid Brevicoryne brassicae:: an ecological and molecular approach

期刊

PLANT CELL AND ENVIRONMENT
卷 31, 期 11, 页码 1592-1605

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-3040.2008.01871.x

关键词

Brassica oleracea; Brevicoryne brassicae; aphid performance; comparative genomics; defence; gene expression; microarray

资金

  1. Dutch Ministry of Agriculture, Nature and Food Quality
  2. Netherlands Organization for Scientific Research, NWO [865.03.002]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Intraspecific variation in resistance or susceptibility to herbivorous insects has been widely studied through bioassays. However, few studies have combined this with a full transcriptomic analysis. Here, we take such an approach to study the interaction between the aphid Brevicoryne brassicae and four white cabbage (Brassica oleracea var. capitata) cultivars. Both under glasshouse and field conditions, two of the cultivars clearly supported a faster aphid population development than the other two, indicating that aphid population development was largely independent of the environmental conditions. Genome-wide transcriptomic analysis using 70-mer oligonucleotide microarrays based on the Arabidopsis thaliana genome showed that only a small number of genes were differentially regulated, and that this regulation was highly cultivar specific. The temporal pattern in the expression behaviour of two B. brassicae-responsive genes in all four cultivars together with targeted studies employing A. thaliana knockout mutants revealed a possible role for a trypsin-and-protease inhibitor in defence against B. brassicae. Conversely, a xyloglucan endotransglucosylase seemed to have no effect on aphid performance. Overall, this study shows clear intraspecific variation in B. brassicae susceptibility among B. oleracea cultivars under glasshouse and field conditions that can be partly explained by certain differences in induced transcriptional changes.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据