4.8 Article

Polyploid Evolution of the Brassicaceae during the Cenozoic Era

期刊

PLANT CELL
卷 26, 期 7, 页码 2777-2791

出版社

OXFORD UNIV PRESS INC
DOI: 10.1105/tpc.114.126391

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Research Council Canada (NRC) Natural Products Genomics Network program
  2. Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada Canadian Crop Genomics Initiative
  3. Division Of Integrative Organismal Systems
  4. Direct For Biological Sciences [1202793] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The Brassicaceae (Cruciferae) family, owing to its remarkable species, genetic, and physiological diversity as well as its significant economic potential, has become a model for polyploidy and evolutionary studies. Utilizing extensive transcriptome pyrosequencing of diverse taxa, we established a resolved phylogeny of a subset of crucifer species. We elucidated the frequency, age, and phylogenetic position of polyploidy and lineage separation events that have marked the evolutionary history of the Brassicaceae. Besides the well-known ancient a (47 million years ago [Mya]) and beta (124 Mya) paleopolyploidy events, several species were shown to have undergone a further more recent (similar to 7 to 12 Mya) round of genome multiplication. We identified eight whole-genome duplications corresponding to at least five independent neo/mesopolyploidy events. Although the Brassicaceae family evolved from other eudicots at the beginning of the Cenozoic era of the Earth (60 Mya), major diversification occurred only during the Neogene period (0 to 23 Mya). Remarkably, the widespread species divergence, major polyploidy, and lineage separation events during Brassicaceae evolution are clustered in time around epoch transitions characterized by prolonged unstable climatic conditions. The synchronized diversification of Brassicaceae species suggests that polyploid events may have conferred higher adaptability and increased tolerance toward the drastically changing global environment, thus facilitating species radiation.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据