4.8 Article

LNK1 and LNK2 Are Transcriptional Coactivators in the Arabidopsis Circadian Oscillator

期刊

PLANT CELL
卷 26, 期 7, 页码 2843-2857

出版社

AMER SOC PLANT BIOLOGISTS
DOI: 10.1105/tpc.114.126573

关键词

-

资金

  1. Special Program for Key Basic Research of the Ministry of Science and Technology of China [2012CB126303]
  2. National Science Foundation of China [31071247]
  3. Program for New Century Excellent Talents in University of the Ministry of Education of China [NCET-13-0771]
  4. Hebei Science Fund for Distinguished Young Scholars [C2011205034, CPRC036, 20100502]
  5. U.S. National Science Foundation [IOS-0923752, IOS-1025965]
  6. Division Of Integrative Organismal Systems
  7. Direct For Biological Sciences [0923752, 1025965] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Transcriptional feedback loops are central to the architecture of eukaryotic circadian clocks. Models of the Arabidopsis thaliana circadian clock have emphasized transcriptional repressors, but recently, Myb-like REVEILLE (RVE) transcription factors have been established as transcriptional activators of central clock components, including PSEUDO-RESPONSE REGULATOR5 (PRR5) and TIMING OF CAB EXPRESSION1 (TOC1). We show here that NIGHT LIGHT-INDUCIBLE AND CLOCK-REGULATED1 (LNK1) and LNK2, members of a small family of four LNK proteins, dynamically interact with morning-expressed oscillator components, including RVE4 and RVE8. Mutational disruption of LNK1 and LNK2 function prevents transcriptional activation of PRR5 by RVE8. The LNKs lack known DNA binding domains, yet LNK1 acts as a transcriptional activator in yeast and in planta. Chromatin immunoprecipitation shows that LNK1 is recruited to the PRR5 and TOC1 promoters in planta. We conclude that LNK1 is a transcriptional coactivator necessary for expression of the clock genes PRR5 and TOC1 through recruitment to their promoters via interaction with bona fide DNA binding proteins such as RVE4 and RVE8.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据