4.8 Review

Complexity of the Alternative Splicing Landscape in Plants

期刊

PLANT CELL
卷 25, 期 10, 页码 3657-3683

出版社

OXFORD UNIV PRESS INC
DOI: 10.1105/tpc.113.117523

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Science Foundation
  2. Department of Energy
  3. USDA
  4. Austrian Science Fund [DK W1207, SFB RNA-REG F43-P10, ERA-NET Plant Genomics [PASAS] I254]
  5. European Union [LSHG-CT-2005-518238]
  6. Austrian Science Fund (FWF) [I 254] Funding Source: researchfish
  7. Austrian Science Fund (FWF) [W1207, I254] Funding Source: Austrian Science Fund (FWF)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Alternative splicing (AS) of precursor mRNAs (pre-mRNAs) from multiexon genes allows organisms to increase their coding potential and regulate gene expression through multiple mechanisms. Recent transcriptome-wide analysis of AS using RNA sequencing has revealed that AS is highly pervasive in plants. Pre-mRNAs from over 60% of intron-containing genes undergo AS to produce a vast repertoire of mRNA isoforms. The functions of most splice variants are unknown. However, emerging evidence indicates that splice variants increase the functional diversity of proteins. Furthermore, AS is coupled to transcript stability and translation through nonsense-mediated decay and microRNA-mediated gene regulation. Widespread changes in AS in response to developmental cues and stresses suggest a role for regulated splicing in plant development and stress responses. Here, we review recent progress in uncovering the extent and complexity of the AS landscape in plants, its regulation, and the roles of AS in gene regulation. The prevalence of AS in plants has raised many new questions that require additional studies. New tools based on recent technological advances are allowing genome-wide analysis of RNA elements in transcripts and of chromatin modifications that regulate AS. Application of these tools in plants will provide significant new insights into AS regulation and crosstalk between AS and other layers of gene regulation.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据