4.8 Article

The Cold Signaling Attenuator HIGH EXPRESSION OF OSMOTICALLY RESPONSIVE GENE1 Activates FLOWERING LOCUS C Transcription via Chromatin Remodeling under Short-Term Cold Stress in Arabidopsis

期刊

PLANT CELL
卷 25, 期 11, 页码 4378-4390

出版社

AMER SOC PLANT BIOLOGISTS
DOI: 10.1105/tpc.113.118364

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Research Foundation of Korea [2012055546, 20120005600]
  2. Next-Generation BioGreen 21 Program (Plant Molecular Breeding Center) [201203013055290010200]
  3. Rural Development Administration
  4. Agricultural R&D Promotion Center [309017-05-4-HD140]
  5. Korea Ministry for Food, Agriculture, Forestry, and Fisheries
  6. Human Frontier Science Program [RGP0002/2012]
  7. Japan Science and Technology Agency (JST), Core Research for Evolutionary Science and Technology (CREST)
  8. RIKEN Research Institute

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Exposure to short-term cold stress delays flowering by activating the floral repressor FLOWERING LOCUS C (FLC) in Arabidopsis thaliana. The cold signaling attenuator HIGH EXPRESSION OF OSMOTICALLY RESPONSIVE GENE1 (HOS1) negatively regulates cold responses. Notably, HOS1-deficient mutants exhibit early flowering, and FLC expression is suppressed in the mutants. However, it remains unknown how HOS1 regulates FLC expression. Here, we show that HOS1 induces FLC expression by antagonizing the actions of FVE and its interacting partner histone deacetylase 6 (HDA6) under short-term cold stress. HOS1 binds to FLC chromatin in an FVE-dependent manner, and FVE is essential for the HOS1-mediated activation of FLC transcription. HOS1 also interacts with HDA6 and inhibits the binding of HDA6 to FLC chromatin. Intermittent cold treatments induce FLC expression by activating HOS1, which attenuates the activity of HDA6 in silencing FLC chromatin, and the effects of intermittent cold are diminished in hos1 and fve mutants. These observations indicate that HOS1 acts as a chromatin remodeling factor for FLC regulation under short-term cold stress.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据