4.8 Article

An Arabidopsis Cell Wall Proteoglycan Consists of Pectin and Arabinoxylan Covalently Linked to an Arabinogalactan Protein

期刊

PLANT CELL
卷 25, 期 1, 页码 270-287

出版社

AMER SOC PLANT BIOLOGISTS
DOI: 10.1105/tpc.112.107334

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Science Foundation [NSF-MCB 0646109]
  2. Department of Energy Center [DOE DE-FG02-09ER20097]
  3. BioEnergy Science Center [DE-AC05-00OR22725]
  4. Office of Biological and Environmental Research in the Department of Energy Office of Science
  5. National Science Foundation Plant Genome Program [DBI-0421683]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Plant cell walls are comprised largely of the polysaccharides cellulose, hemicellulose, and pectin, along with; similar to 10% protein and up to 40% lignin. These wall polymers interact covalently and noncovalently to form the functional cell wall. Characterized cross-links in the wall include covalent linkages between wall glycoprotein extensins between rhamnogalacturonan II monomer domains and between polysaccharides and lignin phenolic residues. Here, we show that two isoforms of a purified Arabidopsis thaliana arabinogalactan protein (AGP) encoded by hydroxyproline-rich glycoprotein family protein gene At3g45230 are covalently attached to wall matrix hemicellulosic and pectic polysaccharides, with rhamnogalacturonan I (RG I)/homogalacturonan linked to the rhamnosyl residue in the arabinogalactan (AG) of the AGP and with arabinoxylan attached to either a rhamnosyl residue in the RG I domain or directly to an arabinosyl residue in the AG glycan domain. The existence of this wall structure, named ARABINOXYLAN PECTIN ARABINOGALACTAN PROTEIN1 (APAP1), is contrary to prevailing cell wall models that depict separate protein, pectin, and hemicellulose polysaccharide networks. The modified sugar composition and increased extractability of pectin and xylan immunoreactive epitopes in apap1 mutant aerial biomass support a role for the APAP1 proteoglycan in plant wall architecture and function.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据