4.8 Article

Prediction of Regulatory Interactions from Genome Sequences Using a Biophysical Model for the Arabidopsis LEAFY Transcription Factor

期刊

PLANT CELL
卷 23, 期 4, 页码 1293-1306

出版社

AMER SOC PLANT BIOLOGISTS
DOI: 10.1105/tpc.111.083329

关键词

-

资金

  1. Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique
  2. Agence Nationale de la Recherche (ANR)
  3. Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council
  4. University J. Fourier, Grenoble
  5. FP7 Collaborative Project AENEAS [KBBE-2009-226477]
  6. ERA-NET Plant Genomics Project BLOOM-NET [SCHM 1560/7-1]
  7. Max Planck Society

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Despite great advances in sequencing technologies, generating functional information for nonmodel organisms remains a challenge. One solution lies in an improved ability to predict genetic circuits based on primary DNA sequence in combination with detailed knowledge of regulatory proteins that have been characterized in model species. Here, we focus on the LEAFY (LFY) transcription factor, a conserved master regulator of floral development. Starting with biochemical and structural information, we built a biophysical model describing LFY DNA binding specificity in vitro that accurately predicts in vivo LFY binding sites in the Arabidopsis thaliana genome. Applying the model to other plant species, we could follow the evolution of the regulatory relationship between LFY and the AGAMOUS (AG) subfamily of MADS box genes and show that this link predates the divergence between monocots and eudicots. Remarkably, our model succeeds in detecting the connection between LFY and AG homologs despite extensive variation in binding sites. This demonstrates that the cis-element fluidity recently observed in animals also exists in plants, but the challenges it poses can be overcome with predictions grounded in a biophysical model. Therefore, our work opens new avenues to deduce the structure of regulatory networks from mere inspection of genomic sequences.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据