4.8 Article

Frequent Gene Movement and Pseudogene Evolution Is Common to the Large and Complex Genomes of Wheat, Barley, and Their Relatives

期刊

PLANT CELL
卷 23, 期 5, 页码 1706-1718

出版社

OXFORD UNIV PRESS INC
DOI: 10.1105/tpc.111.086629

关键词

-

资金

  1. German Ministry of Education and Research (BMBF) [FKZ 0314000, GABI-BARLEX]
  2. Swiss National Science Foundation [3100A-127061/1]
  3. Czech Republic Ministry of Education Youth and Sports [LC06004, OC08025]
  4. Commissariat a l'Energie Atomique-Genoscope [AP2008]
  5. Agence Nationale de la Recherche [ANR-GPLA06001G]
  6. European Community [FP7-212019]
  7. European Cooperation in Science and Technology [FA0604]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

All six arms of the group 1 chromosomes of hexaploid wheat (Triticum aestivum) were sequenced with Roche/454 to 1.3- to 2.2-fold coverage and compared with similar data sets from the homoeologous chromosome 1H of barley (Hordeum vulgare). Six to ten thousand gene sequences were sampled per chromosome. These were classified into genes that have their closest homologs in the Triticeae group 1 syntenic region in Brachypodium, rice (Oryza sativa), and/or sorghum (Sorghum bicolor) and genes that have their homologs elsewhere in these model grass genomes. Although the number of syntenic genes was similar between the homologous groups, the amount of nonsyntenic genes was found to be extremely diverse between wheat and barley and even between wheat subgenomes. Besides a small core group of genes that are nonsyntenic in other grasses but conserved among Triticeae, we found thousands of genic sequences that are specific to chromosomes of one single species or subgenome. By examining in detail 50 genes from chromosome 1H for which BAC sequences were available, we found that many represent pseudogenes that resulted from transposable element activity and double-strand break repair. Thus, Triticeae seem to accumulate nonsyntenic genes frequently. Since many of them are likely to be pseudogenes, total gene numbers in Triticeae are prone to pronounced overestimates.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据