4.8 Article

Gravitropism of Arabidopsis thaliana Roots Requires the Polarization of PIN2 toward the Root Tip in Meristematic Cortical Cells

期刊

PLANT CELL
卷 22, 期 6, 页码 1762-1776

出版社

AMER SOC PLANT BIOLOGISTS
DOI: 10.1105/tpc.110.075317

关键词

-

资金

  1. Iwate University
  2. Ministry of Education, Sports, Culture, Science, and Technology of Japan [21780305]
  3. Ministry of Culture, Sports, Science, and Technology, Japan
  4. U.S. Department of Energy [DE-FG02 03ER15421]
  5. U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) [DE-FG02-03ER15421] Funding Source: U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)
  6. Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research [21780305] Funding Source: KAKEN

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In the root, the transport of auxin from the tip to the elongation zone, referred to here as shootward, governs gravitropic bending. Shootward polar auxin transport, and hence gravitropism, depends on the polar deployment of the PIN-FORMED auxin efflux carrier PIN2. In Arabidopsis thaliana, PIN2 has the expected shootward localization in epidermis and lateral root cap; however, this carrier is localized toward the root tip (rootward) in cortical cells of the meristem, a deployment whose function is enigmatic. We use pharmacological and genetic tools to cause a shootward relocation of PIN2 in meristematic cortical cells without detectably altering PIN2 polarization in other cell types or PIN1 polarization. This relocation of cortical PIN2 was negatively regulated by the membrane trafficking factor GNOM and by the regulatory A1 subunit of type 2-A protein phosphatase (PP2AA1) but did not require the PINOID protein kinase. When GNOM was inhibited, PINOID abundance increased and PP2AA1 was partially immobilized, indicating both proteins are subject to GNOM-dependent regulation. Shootward PIN2 specifically in the cortex was accompanied by enhanced shootward polar auxin transport and by diminished gravitropism. These results demonstrate that auxin flow in the root cortex is important for optimal gravitropic response.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据