4.4 Article

Identification of quantitative trait loci underlying seed protein and oil contents of soybean across multi-genetic backgrounds and environments

期刊

PLANT BREEDING
卷 132, 期 6, 页码 630-641

出版社

WILEY-BLACKWELL
DOI: 10.1111/pbr.12091

关键词

soybean; protein and oil QTL; multi-genetic backgrounds; multi-environments; epistatic effect

资金

  1. National Core Soybean Genetic Engineering Project [2011ZX08004-002]
  2. Chinese National Natural Science Foundation [60932008, 30971810, 31201227]
  3. National 973 Project [2009CB118400, 2012CB126311]
  4. National 863 Project [(2012AA101106-1-9]
  5. China Postdoctoral Science Foundation [2012M520700]
  6. Provincial/National Education Ministry for the team of soybean molecular design

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Seed protein and oil contents are important quantitative traits in soybean. Previously, quantitative trait loci (QTL) associated with seed protein and oil were mostly identified in single genetic background. The objective of this work was to identify QTL and their epistatic effects underlying seed protein and oil contents in three recombinant inbred line populations (two of them used one common female parent) across eight environments by composite interval mapping. Forty QTL underlying protein content and 35 QTL underlying oil content were identified. Among them, nine were universal QTL underlying protein content and four were universal QTL underlying oil content. Epistatic interactions between QTL underlying seed protein/oil and different genetic backgrounds were detected. Different pairs of epistatic interactions were observed in diverse genetic backgrounds across multi-environments. Common marker intervals were observed to simultaneously underlie seed protein and oil contents with different epistatic interactions. The results in this study suggested that a specific genotype with high oil content and low protein content might significantly affect the selection of soybean lines for high seed protein.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据