4.2 Article

Expression of foreign aquaporin genes in lily pollen protoplasts

期刊

PLANT BIOTECHNOLOGY
卷 28, 期 5, 页码 509-514

出版社

JAPANESE SOC PLANT CELL & MOLECULAR BIOLOGY
DOI: 10.5511/plantbiotechnology.11.0922a

关键词

Lilium longiflorum; plasma membrane aquaporin; pollen; protoplast; water permeability

资金

  1. Promotion of Research at Yokohama City University
  2. Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research [22570068, 22580207] Funding Source: KAKEN

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Aquaporins facilitate water flux across biomembranes in cells and are involved in various physiological phenomena in several plant tissues. Generally, the water-flux activity of exogenously expressed aquaporins is measured in Xenopus laevis oocytes or yeast. However, heterogeneous systems are not likely to be optimal for plant aquaporin analysis. Thus, we created a new experimental system for functional analysis of plant aquaporins using lily (Lilium longiflorum) pollen protoplasts. Large protoplasts with uniform diameters of approximately 95m m were isolated from lily pollen grains. No plasma membrane intrinsic protein (PIP) aquaporin was detected in lily pollen. For ectopic expression of PIPs in the lily pollen protoplasts, we constructed plasmids in which Arabidopsis AtPIP1;1 or AtPIP2;1 was under the control of a strong pollen-specific promoter (maize Zm13). The PCR-amplified DNA fragments were transformed into the pollen protoplasts by electroporation. Between 45 and 60% of protoplasts were successfully transformed. The protoplasts expressing AtPIP2; 1 significantly increased in volume in a hypotonic solution (350 mM mannitol), compared with the vector control. In contrast, the changes in volume of the protoplasts expressing AtPIP1; 1 were similar to that of the vector control. This result suggests that PIP2 induces higher water-flux activity in plant cells, whereas PIP1 does not. Thus, we propose the lily pollen protoplast as a simple and useful experimental system to analyze the function of plant aquaporins.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据