4.5 Review

Recent advances in nanotechnology-based detection and separation of circulating tumor cells

出版社

WILEY-BLACKWELL
DOI: 10.1002/wnan.1360

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Science Foundation (NSF) [DMR1409161]
  2. National Institutes of Health (NIH) [R01CA182528]
  3. Technological Innovation R&D Program - Small and Medium Business Administration of Korea [S2083505]
  4. Direct For Mathematical & Physical Scien
  5. Division Of Materials Research [1409161] Funding Source: National Science Foundation
  6. Division Of Materials Research
  7. Direct For Mathematical & Physical Scien [1741560] Funding Source: National Science Foundation
  8. Korea Evaluation Institute of Industrial Technology (KEIT) [S2083505] Funding Source: Korea Institute of Science & Technology Information (KISTI), National Science & Technology Information Service (NTIS)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Although circulating tumor cells (CTCs) in blood have been widely investigated as a potential biomarker for diagnosis and prognosis of metastatic cancer, their inherent rarity and heterogeneity bring tremendous challenges to develop a CTC detection method with clinically significant specificity and sensitivity. With advances in nanotechnology, a series of new methods that are highly promising have emerged to enable or enhance detection and separation of CTCs from blood. In this review, we systematically categorize nanomaterials, such as gold nanoparticles, magnetic nanoparticles, quantum dots, graphenes/graphene oxides, and dendrimers and stimuli-responsive polymers, used in the newly developed CTC detection methods. This will provide a comprehensive overview of recent advances in the CTC detection achieved through application of nanotechnology as well as the challenges that these existing technologies must overcome to be directly impactful on human health. WIREs Nanomed Nanobiotechnol 2016, 8:223-239. doi: 10.1002/wnan.1360 For further resources related to this article, please visit the .

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据