4.7 Article

Root morphological responses to localized nutrient supply differ among crop species with contrasting root traits

期刊

PLANT AND SOIL
卷 376, 期 1-2, 页码 151-163

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s11104-013-1965-9

关键词

Crop species; Nutrient patches; Nutrient-specific responses; Root/shoot partitioning; Root morphological plasticity

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China (NSFC) [31330070, 30925024, 31210103906]
  2. NSFC [31121062]
  3. Program of Introducing International Advanced Agricultural Science and Technology of the Ministry of Agriculture of China (948 Program) [2011-G18]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Roots have morphological plasticity to adapt to heterogeneous nutrient distribution in soil, but little is known about crop differences in root plasticity. The objective of this study was to evaluate root morphological strategies of four crop species in response to soil zones enriched with different nutrients. Four crop species that are common in intercropping systems [maize (Zea mays L.), wheat (Triticum aestivum L.), faba bean (Vicia faba L.), and chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.)] and have contrasting root morphological traits were grown for 45 days under uniform or localized nitrogen and phosphorus supply. For each species tested, the nutrient supply patterns had no effect on shoot biomass and specific root length. However, localized supply of ammonium plus phosphorus induced maize and wheat root proliferation in the nutrient-rich zone. Localized supply of ammonium alone suppressed the whole root growth of chickpea and maize, whereas localized phosphorus plus ammonium reversed (maize and chickpea ) the negative effect of ammonium. The localized root proliferation of chickpea in a nutrient-rich zone did not increase the whole root length and root surface area. Faba bean had no significant response to localized nutrient supply. The root morphological plasticity is influenced by nutrient-specific and species-specific responses, with the greater plasticity in graminaceous (eg. maize) than leguminous species (eg. faba bean and chickpea).

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据