4.7 Article

Biogeochemical transformations of amino acids in soil assessed by position-specific labelling

期刊

PLANT AND SOIL
卷 373, 期 1-2, 页码 385-401

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s11104-013-1764-3

关键词

Position-specific tracers; Amino acids stabilization; Sorption; Exoenzyme and uptake kinetics; Metabolic tracing; Soil organic matter formation; Sterilization and inhibition methods; Biochemical pathways

资金

  1. Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Amino acid turnover in soil is an important element of terrestrial carbon and nitrogen cycles. This study accounts for their driver - the microbial metabolism - by tracing them via the unique isotopic approach of position-specific labeling. Three C-14 isotopomers of alanine at five concentration levels combined with selective sterilization were used to distinguish sorption mechanisms, exoenzymatic and microbial utilization of amino acids in soil. Sorption and microbial uptake occurred immediately. Unspecific microbial uptake followed a linear kinetic, whereas energy-dependent uptake followed Michaelis-Menten. Less than 6 % of the initially added alanine was sorbed to soil, but after microbial transformation products were bound to the soil matrix at higher proportions (5-25 %). The carboxyl group (C-1) was rapidly oxidized by microorganisms, whereas C-2 and C-3 positions were preferentially incorporated into microbial biomass. Dependency of C metabolization on amino acid concentration reflected individual alanine transformation pathways for starvation, maintenance and growth conditions. This study demonstrates that position-specific labeling determines the mechanisms and rates of C cycling from individual functional groups. This approach reflected underlying metabolic pathways and revealed the formation of new organic matter. We therefore conclude that position-specific labeling is a unique tool for detailed insights into submolecular transformation pathways and their regulation factors.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据