4.7 Article

Combining ecophysiological and microbial ecological approaches to study the relationship between Medicago truncatula genotypes and their associated rhizosphere bacterial communities

期刊

PLANT AND SOIL
卷 365, 期 1-2, 页码 183-199

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s11104-012-1364-7

关键词

Bacterial communities; Diversity; Genetic structure; Medicago truncatula; Nutrition; Rhizosphere

资金

  1. INRA [089201PPO24S00901]
  2. Regional Council of Burgundy (France)
  3. Regional Council of Burgundy [AIB 29000427, 29000594]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

To assess how plant genotype and rhizosphere bacterial communities may interact, the genetic structure and diversity of bacterial communities in the rhizosphere soil of different Medicago truncatula genotypes were studied in relation to the plant carbon and nitrogen nutrition at the whole plant level. The genetic structure and diversity of plant-associated rhizosphere bacterial communities was analysed by Automated Ribosomal Intergenic Spacer Analysis and 454-pyrosequencing. In parallel, the carbon and nitrogen nutrition of the plants was estimated by a phenotypic description at both structural level (growth) and functional level (using carbon and nitrogen isotope labeling and an ecophysiological framework). An early effect of the plant genotype was observed on the rhizosphere bacterial communities, while few significant differences were detected at the plant structural phenotypic level. However, at a functional level, the different Medicago truncatula genotypes could be distinguished by their different nutritional strategies. Moreover, a comparison analysis showed that ecophysiological profiles of the different Medicago truncatula genotypes were correlated to the genetic structure and the diversity of the rhizosphere bacterial communities. The exploration of the genetic structure and diversity of rhizosphere bacterial communities combined with an ecophysiological approach is an innovative way to progress in our knowledge of plant-microbe interactions in the rhizosphere.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据