4.7 Article

High-Density Lipoproteins Reduce Endothelial-to-Mesenchymal Transition

期刊

出版社

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1161/ATVBAHA.115.305887

关键词

aortic endothelial cells; endothelial-to-mesenchymal transition; fibrosis; HDL; transforming growth factor

资金

  1. DZHK
  2. MEDIA
  3. European Foundation for the study of diabetes (EFSD)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Objective Endothelial-to-mesenchymal transition is an inflammation-induced process by which endothelial cells can transdifferentiate into fibroblasts. Based on the endothelial-protective and antifibrotic effects of high-density lipoproteins (HDL), we aimed to investigate whether HDL can reduce endothelial-to-mesenchymal transition. Approach and Results Therefore, human aortic endothelial cells were stimulated with the profibrotic factor transforming growth factor (TGF)-1 in the presence or absence of HDL. Their impact on the transition of endothelial cells to mesenchymal-like cells was analyzed. Phase contrast microscopy demonstrated that HDL abrogated the TGF-1-induced spindle-shape morphology in human aortic endothelial cells. Furthermore, HDL decreased the TGF-1-mediated induction of -smooth muscle actin expression and concomitant loss in endothelial cadherin expression, as shown by immunofluorescence staining and flow cytometry. In addition, HDL decreased the TGF-1-induced collagen deposition in human aortic endothelial cells involving the scavenger receptor class B, type 1 and downstream phosphatidyl inositol-3-kinase following the findings that the HDL-mediated reduction was abrogated by scavenger receptor class B, type 1 siRNA knockdown and phosphatidyl inositol-3-kinase inhibition, respectively. The HDL-mediated reduction in endothelial-to-mesenchymal transition was associated with an induction of the inhibitory Smad, Smad 7. Conclusions We provide the first in vitro evidence that the endothelial-protective and antifibrotic effects of HDL include the reduction in endothelial-to-mesenchymal transition.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据