4.7 Article

Nitrogen fertilisation reduces grass-induced N2 fixation of tree seedlings from semi-arid savannas

期刊

PLANT AND SOIL
卷 365, 期 1-2, 页码 307-320

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s11104-012-1389-y

关键词

Acacia mellifera; Bush encroachment; Carbon isotope discrimination; delta N-15 values; Nitrogen fixation; Semi-arid savanna; Tree-grass coexistence; WUE

资金

  1. National Research Foundation of South Africa
  2. International Foundation for Science, Stockholm, Sweden

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Coexistence of trees and grasses in nutrient-poor arid savannas may result in competition for soil N. While grasses may be more effective than woody plants in acquiring N from the soil, some leguminous woody species rely on N-2 fixation. We assessed the role of N-2 fixation in the N-budget of Acacia mellifera seedlings by varying N supply and grass competition. The contribution of N-2 fixation to the N-budget of Acacia mellifera seedlings with varying N supply and grass competition was determined by measuring growth, nutrient concentrations, and N-15 values. Tree seedlings were 4-fold taller and had 20-fold more biomass in the absence of grass. Tree foliar delta N-15 was lower with (-0.25 +/- 0.2aEuro degrees, n = 9) than without grasses (5.2 +/- 0.1aEuro degrees, n = 64). The contribution of N-2-fixation to the N budget decreased with increasing N supply. Greater reliance on N-2-fixation by trees in the presence of grasses did not result in greater biomass accumulation or tissue [N] relative to tree seedlings grown without grass competition. Tree seedlings competing with grass had significantly more negative delta C-13 (-29.5 +/- 0.6aEuro degrees) than seedlings without grass competition (-28.8aEuro degrees aEuro parts per thousand +/- 0.5aEuro degrees). Induction of N-2-fixation by grass may have resulted from competition for nutrients. N-2-fixation enables tree seedlings to compensate for limited soil N and survive grass competition at a critical and vulnerable developmental stage of germination and establishment.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据