4.7 Article

Nitrate supply affects root growth differentially in two rice cultivars differing in nitrogen use efficiency

期刊

PLANT AND SOIL
卷 343, 期 1-2, 页码 357-368

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s11104-011-0723-0

关键词

Auxin; Nitrate; Rice; Root initiation

资金

  1. National Nature Science Foundation of China [30771290, 31071846]
  2. Ministry of Science and Technology of China [2011CB100302]
  3. China Postdoctoral Science Foundation [20100471348]
  4. State Key Laboratory of Soil and Sustainable Agriculture, Institute of Soil Science [Y052010013]
  5. National Innovation Experiment Program for University Students [091030725]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Partial nitrate nutrition was testified to improve rice (Oryza sativa L.) growth. However, how partial nitrate nutrition is related to root growth in rice cultivars with different N-use efficiency is still unclear. Two rice cultivars, Nanguang (high N-use efficiency) and Elio (low N-use efficiency), were grown on six ratios of NH (4) (+) /NO (3) (-) in the solution. The response of root growth to partial nitrate nutrition was investigated and N status and auxin concentration were recorded in order to elucidate the mechanisms by which the optimal ratio of NH (4) (+) /NO (3) (-) that controls the architecture of the root system. The length of adventitious and lateral roots was stimulated only in cv. Nanguang by partial nitrate nutrition. Nitrate-stimulated root length in Nanguang resulted mainly from root initiation rather than root elongation. Root biomass was similar between two rice cultivars under NH (4) (+) supplied, while higher root biomass was observed in cv. Nanguang than in cv. Elio under 25% nitrate supplied for 10 weeks. Significant IAA increase was recorded in cv. Nanguang under 25% nitrate presence in the nutrition compared to under sole NH (4) (+) solution. The presence of nitrate increased root initiation in the rice with high N-use efficiency, which led to faster biomass accumulation and higher N-use efficiency at later growth stages.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据