4.7 Review

Aboveground-belowground interactions as a source of complementarity effects in biodiversity experiments

期刊

PLANT AND SOIL
卷 351, 期 1-2, 页码 1-22

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s11104-011-1027-0

关键词

Biodiversity-ecosystem functioning; Decomposers; Plant diversity-productivity relationship; Soil feedback; Soil mutualists; Soil pathogens

资金

  1. Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (German Research Foundation) [Ei 862/1-1]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The positive relationship between biodiversity and ecosystem functioning (BEF) is due mainly to complementarity between species. Most BEF studies primarily focused on plant interactions; however, plants are embedded in a dense network of multitrophic interactions above and below the ground, which are likely to play a crucial role in BEF relationships. In the present review I point out the relevance of aboveground-belowground interactions as a source of complementarity effects in grassland biodiversity experiments. A review of the current knowledge on the role of decomposers, arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi, rhizobia, plant growth promoting rhizobacteria, invertebrate ecosystem engineers, herbivores, pathogens and predators in biodiversity experiments, indicates that soil biota can drive both positive and negative complementarity between plant species via a multitude of mechanisms. I pose four main processes by which aboveground-belowground interactions determine positive complementarity effects: enlarging biotope space, mediating legume effects, increasing plant community resistance, and maintaining plant diversity. By contrast, soil biota may also reinforce negative complementarity effects by competing with plants for nutrients or by exerting herbivore or pathogen pressure, thereby reducing community productivity. Thus, considering aboveground-belowground interactions as well as interactions between antagonistic and mutualistic consumers may improve the mechanistic understanding of complementarity effects in plant diversity-ecosystem functioning experiments and should inspire future research.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据