4.7 Article

Functional relationships between morphology and respiration of fine roots in two Chinese temperate tree species

期刊

PLANT AND SOIL
卷 346, 期 1-2, 页码 375-384

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s11104-011-0825-8

关键词

Fine root respiration; Mean root diameter; Root N concentration; Specific root length; Pinus koraiensis; Tilia amurensis

资金

  1. National Basic Research Program of China (973 Program) [2010CB951301]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [31070350]
  3. Research Fund for the Doctoral Program of Higher Education of China [200802250005]
  4. Northeast Forestry University [gram 09]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Fine root morphology is closely linked with physiological functions. However, we have limited understanding of relationships between morphological traits and respiration of fine roots. In this study, we measured the fine root respiration rates of Tilia amurensis Rupr. and Pinus koraiensis Sieb. et Zucc with a simplified specially designed root-chamber system in the field. We found that mean diameter and specific root length (SRL) exhibited significant power relationships with fine root respiration in both species. Respiration rates of smaller fine roots (< 0.5 mm for Tilia amurensis and < 0.7 mm for Pinus koraiensis) in mean diameter were much higher and varied widely compared with those larger diameter class (0.6-1.8 mm for Tilia amurensis and 0.8-1.9 mm for Pinus koraiensis). Moreover, significant positive relationships existed between fine root nitrogen (N) concentration and respiration in both species. For Tilia amurensis, SRL explained more of the variability in respiration (84%) than diameter or N concentration, while for Pinus koraiensis, fine root N concentration explained more of the variability in respiration (79%) than diameter or SRL. Our results suggest that fine roots are composed of individual roots differing markedly in respiration and morphology, rather than identical units as traditionally assumed.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据