4.7 Article

Influence of frost on nutrient resorption during leaf senescence in a mangrove at its latitudinal limit of distribution

期刊

PLANT AND SOIL
卷 342, 期 1-2, 页码 105-115

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s11104-010-0672-z

关键词

Mangrove; Kandelia obovata; Frost; Low temperature; Nutrition resorption; Flooding; Latitudinal limit

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [30930017]
  2. National Basic Research Program of China [2009CB426306]
  3. National Special Research Programs for Non-Profit Trades [200805072]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The latitudinal distribution of mangrove species is limited mainly by low temperature. Leaf scorch and massive leaf fall are the predominant symptoms of frost damage. Nutrient resorption during leaf senescence is an important adaptation mechanism of mangroves. Abnormal defoliation disturbs nutrient resorption. We evaluated the effects of frost on nutrient loss of mangroves and the protective effects of warmer seawater inundation on reducing nutrient loss. On January 14, 2009, the most cold-tolerant mangrove Kandelia obovata at its naturally latitudinal limit (Fuding, China, 27A degrees 17'N) was exposed to freezing temperature (-2.4A degrees C) for 4 h (minimum -2.8A degrees C). The freezing air temperature occurred during flood tide, resulting that the flooded shoots were protected by warmer seawater. Frost caused 31.3% and 13.0% defoliation on the exposed shoots and the flooded shoots, respectively. Frost restricted nutrient resorption during leaf senescence. K. obovata resorbed 61% N and 42% P during normal leaf senescence, respectively. However, frost-damaged leaves only resorbed 13% N and 10% P during the course, respectively. Foliar N:P molar ratios were < 31, suggesting N limitation. Tidal inundation can partially protect mangroves from frost damage. Reduced nutrient resorption efficiency and massive leaf fall caused by frost add pressure to mangroves under nutrient limitation at their latitudinal limits.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据