4.7 Article

Litterfall production, decomposition and nutrient use efficiency varies with tropical forest types in Xishuangbanna, SW China: a 10-year study

期刊

PLANT AND SOIL
卷 335, 期 1-2, 页码 271-288

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s11104-010-0414-2

关键词

Decomposition; Litterfall dynamic; Man-made forest; Nutrient cycling; Nutrient use efficiency; Seasonal rainforest; Secondary tropical forest

资金

  1. Chinese Ecosystem Research Network (CERN) [KZ951-A1-301, KZ95T-04]
  2. Ministry of Science and Technology of China [2001CCB00600]
  3. Chinese Academy of Sciences [KZCX2-406]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Litterfall production, decomposition and nutrient use efficiency in three different tropical forest ecosystems in SW China were studied for 10 years. Annual mean litterfall production in tropical seasonal forest (TSF) (9.47 +/- 1.65 Mg ha(-1)) was similar to that in man-made tropical forest (MTF) (9.23 +/- 1.29 Mg ha(-1)) (P > 0.05) but both were significantly lower than that in secondary tropical forest (STF) (12.96 +/- 1.71 Mg ha(-1)) (P < 0.05). The annual variation of litterfall was greater in TSF (17.4%, P < 0.05) than in MTF (14.0%) or STF (13.2%). The annual mean decomposition rate of litterfall increased followed the order of MTF (2.72) < TSF (3.15) < STF (3.50) (P < 0.05), which was not correlated with annual precipitation or annual mean temperature, but was rather related to litter quality. The nutrient use efficiency was found to be element-dependent and to vary significantly among the three forest types (P < 0.05). These results indicate that litterfall production and decomposition rates in different tropical forest systems are related to plant species composition and are influenced strongly by coexisting species and their life stage (age) but less so by the species richness. Constructing multi-species and multistory man-made tropical forest is an effective way to enhance biological productivity and maintain soil nutrients on degraded tropical land.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据