4.7 Article

Phosphate-solubilizing peanut associated bacteria: screening for plant growth-promoting activities

期刊

PLANT AND SOIL
卷 329, 期 1-2, 页码 421-431

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s11104-009-0168-x

关键词

Peanut; Native isolates; Plant growth promotion; Phosphate solubilizing bacteria

资金

  1. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Cientificas y Tecnicas (CONICET)
  2. Secretar a de Ciencia y Tecnica de la Universidad Nacional de Rio Cuarto (SECYT-UNRC)
  3. Agencia Nacional de Promocion Cientifica y Tecnologica (ANPCyT)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In the present study, attempts were made to identify the potential of bacterial strains for promoting Arachis hypogaea L. growth. Four hundred and thirty three bacteria were isolated from rhizosphere, phyllosphere and plant tissues from peanuts cultivated in the producing area of Cordoba, Argentina. From this collection, 37 epiphytic isolates and 73 endophytic isolates were selected on the basis of tricalcium phosphate solubilizing activity. These isolates were further tested for other plant growth-promoting attributes and some of them evaluated to examine the effect of inoculation on peanut growth. Siderophore production was observed in a high percentage of the isolates, especially in the root nodule endophytes. Antibiosis was evaluated against the phytopathogen fungus Sclerotinia minor and S. Sclerotiorum. Endophytes from nodules showed the highest levels of fungal growth inhibition. A low number of isolates was able to produce auxin like molecules and inoculation of peanut seedlings with these bacteria showed variability on seed germination enhancement. Isolate J49, identified to belong to genus Pantoea, was the most promising bacterium because it increases peanut plant biomass in inoculation experiments. Peanut soils in the province of Cordoba harbor bacteria with major plant growth promotion properties which represent a potential source of new strains that could be used as biological inoculants in agriculture.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据