4.7 Article

Nitrogen fate and environmental consequence in paddy soil under rice-wheat rotation in the Taihu lake region, China

期刊

PLANT AND SOIL
卷 319, 期 1-2, 页码 225-234

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s11104-008-9865-0

关键词

Nitrogen fate; Nitrogen loss; Paddy soil; Rice-wheat rotation

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [30390080]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Field undisturbed tension-free monolith lysimeters and N-15-labeled urea were used to investigate the fate of fertilizer nitrogen in paddy soil in the Taihu Lake region under a summer rice-winter wheat rotation system. We determined nitrogen recovered by rice and wheat, N remained in soil, and the losses of reactive N (i.e., NH3, N2O, NO3 (-), organic N and NH4 (+)) to the environment. Quantitative allocation of nitrogen fate varied for the rice and wheat growing seasons. At the conventional application rate of 550 kg N ha(-1) y(-1) (250 kg N ha(-1) for wheat and 300 kg N ha(-1) for rice), nitrogen recovery of wheat and rice were 49% and 41%, respectively. The retention of fertilizer N in soil at harvest accounted for 29% in the wheat season and for 22% in the rice season. N losses through NH3 volatilization from flooded rice paddy was 12%, far greater than that in the wheat season (less than 1%), while N leaching and runoff comprised only 0.3% in the rice season and 5% in the wheat season. Direct N2O emission was 0.12% for the rice season and 0.14% for the wheat season. The results also showed that some dissolved organic N (DON) were leached in both crop seasons. For the wheat season, DON contributed 40-72% to the N- leaching, in the rice season leached DON was 64-77% of the total N leaching. With increasing fertilizer application rate, NH3 volatilization in the rice season increased proportionally more than the fertilizer increase, N leaching in the wheat season was proportional to the increase of fertilizer rate, while N2O emission increased less in proportion than fertilizer increase both in the rice season and wheat season.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据