4.7 Article

Elemental 2-D mapping and changes in leaf iron and chlorophyll in response to iron re-supply in iron-deficient GF 677 peach-almond hybrid

期刊

PLANT AND SOIL
卷 315, 期 1-2, 页码 93-106

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s11104-008-9735-9

关键词

Inactive iron; Iron chlorosis; Iron deficiency; Iron re-supply; Leaf iron distribution; Prunus

资金

  1. Spanish MEC [AGL2005-05533, AGL2006-1416]
  2. FEDER
  3. PETRI [PTR1995-0580]
  4. PTR1995-0580) and DGA [A44, A03]
  5. I3P-CSIC predoctoral fellowship

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Iron is an essential micronutrient for plant growth and development, involved in key cellular processes. However, the distribution of Fe in plant tissues is still not well known. In the so-called Fe chlorosis paradox, leaves of fruit trees grown in the field usually have high concentrations of Fe but still are Fe-deficient. Leaves of the Prunus rootstock GF 677 (P. dulcis x P. persica) grown in hydroponics have been used to carry out two-dimensional (2-D) nutrient mapping by synchrotron radiation-induced X-ray fluorescence. Iron-deficient leaves accumulated more Fe in the midrib and veins, with Fe concentration being markedly lower in mesophyll leaf areas. The effects of Fe deficiency and Fe re-supply on leaf chlorophyll concentration and on the distribution of Fe and other nutrients within different plant tissues have been investigated in the same plants. After Fe re-supply, leaf Fe concentrations increased largely in all leaf types. However, whereas re-greening was almost completely achieved in apical leaves, in some expanded leaves the increase in chlorophyll concentration was only moderate. Therefore, after Fe re-supply Fe-deficient expanded leaves of the Prunus rootstock GF 677 had significant increases in Fe concentration but were still chlorotic. This is similar to what occurs in leaves of peach trees in field conditions, opening the possibility that this system could be used as a model to study the Fe chlorosis paradox.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据