4.7 Article

Shoot and root growth of hydroponic maize (Zea mays L.) as influenced by K deficiency

期刊

PLANT AND SOIL
卷 304, 期 1-2, 页码 157-168

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s11104-007-9534-8

关键词

Zea mays; maize; potassium; leaf elongation rate; root elongation rate; root; shoot ratio

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Potassium (K) has major biophysical and biochemical functions in plant physiology. However, plant responses to K deficiency at the whole plant level are not always clearly related to these well-known functions of K at the cellular level. The objective of this study was to investigate the morphological response of maize to increasing K deficiency and test to what extent this morphological response can be interpreted in the light of the simple model proposed by Leigh and Wyn Jones, suggesting that biophysical functions are affected first. Maize was grown in a greenhouse under hydroponic conditions. For half of the plants, K was removed from the nutrient solution from the 4th visible leaf stage. The K content in the starved plants dropped from 100 to 30 mM, and was not fully compensated by an increase in other cations. Leaf elongation rates were reduced on K-deprived plants, whereas axile root elongation rates were slightly increased between 45 degrees C days and 75 degrees C days after starvation, and reduced thereafter. During the first part of the starvation period, i.e. under moderate K deficiency (K concentration above 40 mM), all measured variables suggest that the whole plant response may be interpreted as the consequence of the reduced leaf growth, probably due to insufficient turgor pressure or cell-wall extensibility. This general pattern of response is in agreement with the model of Leigh and Wyn Jones. However, during the second part of the starvation period, i.e. under more severe K deficiency (K concentration below 40 mM), malfunction of additional physiological processes (mostly related to biochemical functions like photosynthetic processes) must be considered to explain the plant morphological response.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据