4.7 Article

Inhibition of net nitrification activity in a Mediterranean woodland: possible role of chemicals produced by Arbutus unedo

期刊

PLANT AND SOIL
卷 315, 期 1-2, 页码 273-283

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s11104-008-9750-x

关键词

Allelopathy; N cycle; Toxicity; Leaf extract; NO(3)(-); (+)-gallocatechin

资金

  1. European Community [EVK2-2001-00296, GOCE-CT-17841]
  2. FISR, Italian Ministry of Environment

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Nitrification is a key biological process for the control of soil NO(3)(-) availability and N losses from terrestrial ecosystems. The study investigates the causes for the absence of net nitrification activity in the soil of a Mediterranean monospecific woodland of Arbutus unedo, focusing in particular on the possible role of chemicals produced by this plant. The mineral N pool, net rates of mineralization and nitrification were measured in the soil top 10 cm over 18 months. Raw extracts of leaves and roots of Arbutus unedo and soil underneath Arbutus plant canopy were purified using chromatographic techniques and the structure of chemicals was defined using spectroscopic and spectrometric methods. Leaf extracts (raw, aqueous and organic fractions) were tested for their toxicity on net nitrification, using a test soil. Field and laboratory incubations showed soil NO(3)(-) concentration below the detection limit over the whole study period, despite the significant NH(4)(+) availability. Toxicity tests indicated that more than 400 mu g of extract g(-1) dry soil were needed to have more than 50% reduction of net NO(3)(-) production. Gallocatechin and catechin were among the most abundant chemicals in the extracts of leaves, roots and soil. Their soil concentration was significantly higher than the annual calculated input via leaf litter, and it was in the range of toxic concentrations, as deduced from the dose-response curve of the toxicity test. Data support the hypothesis that plant produced chemicals might be involved in the limited net nitrate production in this Mediterranean woodland.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据