4.7 Article

Cell Wall Pectic Arabinans Influence the Mechanical Properties of Arabidopsis thaliana Inflorescence Stems and Their Response to Mechanical Stress

期刊

PLANT AND CELL PHYSIOLOGY
卷 54, 期 8, 页码 1278-1288

出版社

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/pcp/pct074

关键词

Arabidopsis thaliana; Biomechanics; Cell wall; LM13 epitope; Mechanical stress; Pectic arabinan

资金

  1. 6th Framework Program of the European Commission project [Marie Curie RTN WallNet] [MRTN-CT-2004-512265]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Little is known of the dynamics of plant cell wall matrix polysaccharides in response to the impact of mechanical stress on plant organs. The capacity of the imposition of a mechanical stress (periodic brushing) to reduce the height of the inflorescence stem of Arabidopsis thaliana seedlings has been used to study the role of pectic arabinans in the mechanical properties and stress responsiveness of a plant organ. The arabinan-deficient-1 (arad1) mutation that affects arabinan structures in epidermal cell walls of inflorescence stems is demonstrated to reduce the impact on inflorescence stem heights caused by mechanical stress. The arabinan-deficient-2 (arad2) mutation, that does not have detectable impact on arabinan structures, is also shown to reduce the impact on stem heights caused by mechanical stress. The LM13 linear arabinan epitope is specifically detected in epidermal cell walls of the younger, flexible regions of inflorescence stems and increases in abundance at the base of inflorescence stems in response to an imposed mechanical stress. The strain (percentage deformation) of stem epidermal cells in the double mutant arad1 x arad2 is lower in unbrushed plants than in wild-type plants, but rises to wild-type levels in response to brushing. The study demonstrates the complexity of arabinan structures within plant cell walls and also that their contribution to cell wall mechanical properties is a factor influencing responsiveness to mechanical stress.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据