4.7 Article

Transformation of β-Lycopene Cyclase Genes from Salicornia europaea and Arabidopsis Conferred Salt Tolerance in Arabidopsis and Tobacco

期刊

PLANT AND CELL PHYSIOLOGY
卷 52, 期 5, 页码 909-921

出版社

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/pcp/pcr043

关键词

Carotenoid; beta-Lycopene cyclase; Oxidative damage; PEBV; Salt tolerance; SeLCY

资金

  1. National High Technology and Research Development Program of China ('863' project) [2007AA091705]
  2. Chinese Ministry of Agriculture Research Program [2009ZX08009-101B]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Inhibition of lycopene cyclization decreased the salt tolerance of the euhalophyte Salicornia europaea L. We isolated a beta-lycopene cyclase gene SeLCY from S. europaea and transformed it into Arabidopsis with stable expression. Transgenic Arabidopsis on post-germination exhibited enhanced tolerance to oxidative and salt stress. After 8 and 21 d recovery from 200 mM NaCl treatment, transgenic lines had a higher survival ratio than wild-type (WT) plants. Three-week-old transgenic plants treated with 200 mM NaCl showed better growth than the WT with higher photosystem activity and less H2O2 accumulation. Determination of endogenous pigments of Arabidopsis treated with 200 mM NaCl for 0, 2 or 4 d demonstrated that the transgenic plants retained higher contents of carotenoids than the WT. Furthermore, to compare the difference between SeLCY and AtLCY from Arabidopsis, we used viral vector mediating ectopic expression of SeLCY and AtLCY in Nicotiana benthamiana. Although LCY genes transformation increased the salt tolerance in tobacco, there is no significant difference between SeLCY- and AtLCY-transformed plants. These findings indicate that SeLCY transgenic Arabidopsis improved salt tolerance by increasing synthesis of carotenoids, which impairs reactive oxygen species and protects the photosynthesis system under salt stress, and as a single gene, SeLCY functionally showed no advantage for salt tolerance improvement compared with AtLCY.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据