4.7 Article

Differences Between Rice and Wheat in Temperature Responses of Photosynthesis and Plant Growth

期刊

PLANT AND CELL PHYSIOLOGY
卷 50, 期 4, 页码 744-755

出版社

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/pcp/pcp029

关键词

Biomass production; N-use efficiency; Oryza sativa L; Photosynthesis; Temperature; Triticum aestivum L

资金

  1. Ministry of Agriculture, Forestry and Fisheries of Japan
  2. Integrated Research Project for Plant, Insect and Animal using Genome Technology [GPN 0007]
  3. Japan Society for Promotion of Science (JSPS) Grant-in-Aid for Scientific Research B [20380041]
  4. Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research [20380041] Funding Source: KAKEN

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The temperature responses of photosynthesis (A) and growth were examined in rice and wheat grown hydroponically under daynight temperature regimes of 1310, 1916, 2519, 3024 and 3731C. Irrespective of growth temperature, the maximal rates of A were found to be at 3035C in rice and at 2530C in wheat. Below 25C the rates were higher in wheat, while above 30C they were higher in rice. However, in both species, A measured at the growth temperature remained almost constant irrespective of temperature. Biomass production and relative growth rate (RGR) were greatest in rice grown at 3024C and in wheat grown at 2519C. Although there was no difference between the species in the optimal temperature of the leaf area ratios (LARs), the net assimilation rate (NAR) in rice decreased at low temperature (1916C) while the NAR in wheat decreased at high temperature (3731C). For both species, the N-use efficiency (NUE) for growth rate (GR), estimated by dividing the NAR by leaf-N content, correlated with GR and with biomass production. Similarly, when NUE for A at growth temperature was estimated, the temperature response of NUE for A was similar to that of NUE for GR in both species. The results suggest that the difference between rice and wheat in the temperature response of biomass production depends on the difference in temperature dependence of NUE for A.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据