4.7 Article

Blue Light-Induced Phototropism of Inflorescence Stems and Petioles is Mediated by Phototropin Family Members phot1 and phot2

期刊

PLANT AND CELL PHYSIOLOGY
卷 50, 期 10, 页码 1774-1785

出版社

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/pcp/pcp119

关键词

Arabidopsis thaliana; Blue light; Leaf movement; Partial irradiation; Phototropin mutants; Photo-receptor

资金

  1. SORST, Japan Science and Technology Corporation
  2. PROBRAIN (Program for Promotion of Basic Research Activities for Innovative Biosciences)
  3. Ministry of Education, Sports, Science and Technology (MEXT) of Japan [13304061, 13139203]
  4. Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research [13304061, 20227001, 13139203] Funding Source: KAKEN

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Phototropin family photoreceptors, phot1 and phot2, in Arabidopsis thaliana control the blue light (BL)-mediated phototropic responses of the hypocotyl, chloroplast relocation movement and stomatal opening. Phototropic responses in dark-grown tissues have been well studied but those in de-etiolated green plants are not well understood. Here, we analyzed phototropic responses of inflorescence stems and petioles of wild-type and phototropin mutant plants of A. thaliana. Similar to the results obtained from dark-grown seedlings, inflorescence stems and petioles in wild-type and phot2 mutant plants showed phototropic bending towards low fluence BL, while in phot1 mutant plants, a high fluence rate of BL was required. phot1 phot2 double mutant plants did not show any phototropic responses even under very high fluence rates of BL. We further studied the photoreceptive sites for phototropic responses of stems and petioles by partial tissue irradiation. The whole part of the inflorescence stem is sensitive to BL and shows phototropism, but in the petiole only the irradiated abaxial side is sensitive. Similar to dark-grown etiolated seedlings, phot1 plays a major role in phototropic responses under weak light, but phot2 functions under high fluence rate conditions in green plants.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据