4.3 Article

Silence on Shangri-La: Attenuation of Huygens acoustic signals suggests surface volatiles

期刊

PLANETARY AND SPACE SCIENCE
卷 90, 期 -, 页码 72-80

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.pss.2013.11.003

关键词

Instrumentation; Acoustics; Planetary atmospheres; Organic chemistry; Attenuation; Huygens probe

资金

  1. Cassini project at the Jet Propulsion Laboratory, via NASA [NNX13AH14G]
  2. STFC [ST/L000776/1, ST/I001964/1] Funding Source: UKRI
  3. Science and Technology Facilities Council [ST/L000776/1, ST/I001964/1] Funding Source: researchfish

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Objective: Characterize and understand acoustic instrument performance on the surface of Titan. Methods: The Huygens probe measured the speed of sound in Titan's atmosphere with a 1 MHz pulse time-of-flight transducer pair near the bottom of the vehicle. We examine the fraction of pulses correctly received as a function of time. Results: This system returned good data from about 11 km altitude, where the atmosphere became thick enough to effectively transmit the sound, down to the surface just before landing: these data have been analyzed previously. After an initial transient at landing, the instrument operated nominally for about 10 mm, recording pulses much as during descent. The fraction of pulses detected then declined and the transmitted sound ceased to be detected altogether, despite no indication of instrument or probe configuration changes. Conclusions: The most likely explanation appears to be absorption of the signal by polyatomic gases with relaxation losses at the instrument frequency, such as ethane, acetylene and carbon dioxide. These vapors, detected independently by the GCMS instrument, were evolved from the surface material by the warmth leaking from the probe, and confirm the nature of the surface materials as 'damp' with a cocktail of volatile compounds. Some suggestions for future missions are considered. (C) 2013 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据